On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 11:07 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Thanks for applying! > Did you expect the series to get applied somewhere (GPIO tree, if there's such a thing?), or the single patches to go through the relevant other trees? Fine with me either way, but it'd be good to know so we don't have the patches twice :) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:01:52 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1438506475-31012-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- References:
- [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven
- [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: Implement pictrl irq wake handler
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] fbdev: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Allow compile test of GPIO consumers if !GPIOLIB
- Index(es):
 |