On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:04:38PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The current interrupt parsing code was working by accident, because the > > default was actually parsing the first node of interrupts. > > > > While that was mostly working (and the flags were actually ignored), this > > binding has never been documented, and doesn't work with SoCs that have > > multiple interrupt banks anyway. > > > > Add a proper interrupt xlate function, that uses the same description than > > the GPIOs (<bank> <pin> <flags>), that will make things less confusing. > > > > The EINT number will still be used as the hwirq number, but won't be > > exposed through the DT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch does not apply to the pinctrl devel branch. > > Does it need to be rebased or do I need to merge in fixes? > > Holding patch 3/4 and 4/4 until this is resolved. I'll rebase and resend the last 2 patches. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
