Hi Linus, 2015-07-15 7:04 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Masahiro Yamada > <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> In my understanding, the GPIO driver framework requires that >> the hw numbers should be contiguous within each GPIO chip. > > Yes but noone says that .request() to the driver has to succeed > on every GPIO so just cover all GPIOs from 0 to 307 with > your GPIO chip and then implement your "holes" in the GPIO > range from 0 to 307 by letting .request() fail. Thanks, At first I also thought about it, but finally I did not adopt it. Having holes in the GPIO range is not handy because: [1] When we map a gpio range into a pin range, we must divide "gpio-ranges" property into many lines gpio-ranges = <phandle 0 x 8 phandle 10 (x+8) 8 phandle 20 (x+16) 8 phandle 30 (x+24) 8 ... [2] implementation of .set_multiple() gets more complicated -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html