On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've been searching for any documentation of 'the active-low property of a GPIO' > already mentioned in this documenation. But couldn't find any. Add it. > > Sigend-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt b/Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt > index 75542b9..f1a6e20 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt > +++ b/Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt > @@ -236,6 +236,32 @@ The active-low state of a GPIO can also be queried using the following call: > Note that these functions should only be used with great moderation ; a driver > should not have to care about the physical line level. > > +The active-low property > +----------------------- > + > +As a driver should not have to care about the physical line level, all of the > +gpiod_set_xxx_value_xxx() functions do take the active-low property into account. > +This does mean that they check whether the GPIO is configured to be active-low. And > +if so, they manipulate the passed value before the physical line level is driven. This would be "all of the gpiod_set_value_xxx() functions, since gpiod_set_raw_value_xxx() ignores the active-low setting. I think it would also be worth to explain that the set_raw/get_raw functions should be avoided as much as possible, especially by drivers which should not care about the actual physical line level and worry about the logical value instead. > + > +With this, all the gpiod_set_xxx_value_xxx() functions interpret the parameter > +"value" as "active" ("1") or "inactive" ("0"). The physical line level will be > +driven accordingly. > + > +As an example, if the active-low poperty for a dedicated GPIO is set, and the > +gpiod_set_xxx_value_xxx() passes "active" ("1"), the physical line level will be > +driven low. > + > +To summarize: > + > +Function (example) active-low proporty physical line > +gpiod_set_raw_value(desc, 0); don't care low > +gpiod_set_raw_value(desc, 1); don't care high > +gpiod_set_value(desc, 0); n/a low > +gpiod_set_value(desc, 1); n/a high What is n/a here? Shouldn't it be "active high (default)"? Once clarified, Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html