On 2 July 2015 at 01:29, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:40:56 AM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are sure >> that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This is needed >> to prevent deferred probes because of some dependencies' drivers not >> having registered yet. >> >> This reduces the total amount of work that the kernel does during boot >> because it won't try to match devices to drivers when built-in drivers >> are still registering but also reduces some parallelism, so total boot >> time might slightly increase or decrease depending on the platform and >> kernel configuration. >> >> This change will make make possible to prevent any deferred probes once >> devices are probed in dependency order. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Instead of delaying all probes until late_initcall, only delay matches >> of platform devices that have a firmware node attached. >> >> drivers/base/property.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c >> index 8528eb9..8ead1ba 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/property.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c >> @@ -16,8 +16,11 @@ >> #include <linux/of.h> >> #include <linux/of_address.h> >> #include <linux/of_device.h> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >> #include <linux/property.h> >> >> +static bool fwnode_match_enable = false; >> + >> /** >> * device_add_property_set - Add a collection of properties to a device object. >> * @dev: Device to add properties to. >> @@ -604,6 +607,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_is_compatible); >> bool fwnode_driver_match_device(struct device *dev, >> const struct device_driver *drv) >> { >> + /* >> + * Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are >> + * sure that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This >> + * is needed to prevent deferred probes because of some drivers >> + * not having registered yet. >> + */ >> + if(dev->bus == &platform_bus_type && !fwnode_match_enable) >> + return false; > > I'm not particularly enthusiastic about referring to specific bus types in > generic code like that. Agreed. > What about having a special version of fwnode_driver_match_device() specifically > for the platform bus type that will do the check? Have moved all this code to base/platform.c instead, as I don't see any reason to have it in property.c. Thanks, Tomeu >> + >> if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) >> return of_driver_match_device(dev, drv); >> else if (is_acpi_node(dev->fwnode)) >> @@ -612,3 +624,20 @@ bool fwnode_driver_match_device(struct device *dev, >> return false; >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_driver_match_device); >> + >> +static int __device_attach(struct device *dev, void *data) >> +{ >> + device_initial_probe(dev); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int fwnode_match_initcall(void) >> +{ >> + fwnode_match_enable = true; >> + >> + bus_for_each_dev(&platform_bus_type, NULL, NULL, __device_attach); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +late_initcall(fwnode_match_initcall); >> > > -- > I speak only for myself. > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html