Re: [PATCH] gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions

[Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that all[1] users of the gpiod_get functions are converted to make
> use of the up to now optional flags parameter, make it mandatory which
> allows to remove some cpp magic.
>
> [1] all but etraxfs-uart which is broken anyhow and I'm allowed to
>     ignore it by Jesper Nilsson :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> the claim that all drivers are fixed is only true in my tree. I sent
> several patches, some of them are not in next yet.
>
> The gpiod branch in my repo[2] currently contains (in this order):
>  - several patches cherry-picked from next that introduce new users of
>    gpiod_get without flags;
>  - several patches that fix gpiod_get users to make use of flags that
>    are already in next;
>  - several patches that fix gpiod_get users to make use of flags that
>    are not yet in next;
>  - this patch
>
> I loosely agreed to Linus and Alexandre to get this change into next as
> soon as 4.2-rc1 arrives. To assert that they have seen it before, I send
> this mail. Also the remaining patches in my tree that don't make it into
> 4.2-rc1 should probably be taken before. So I plan to rebase my tree on
> top of 4.2-rc1 as soon as it arrives and ask Linus to pull it for next
> in the hope that it became considerably shorter by then. At least the
> first two groups above should disappear.
>
> Some of the patches in the category "not in next yet" didn't get a
> response from a maintainer. I just pinged these.
>
> I wrote a cocci-rule that finds all offending users, so I'm fairly
> confident that I caught all of them as of next-20150615.

Uwe, a big *thank you* for taking care of this and making GPIO safer
for everyone.

Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in