On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Russell King wrote: > The gemini code was installing its chained interrupt handler (which > enables the interrupt) before it was setting its data, which is bad if > the IRQ was previously pending. Avoid this problem by converting it to > irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(). > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Depends on patch 1. > > arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c > index f8cb5710d6ee..3292f2e6ed6f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-gemini/gpio.c > @@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ void __init gemini_gpio_init(void) > set_irq_flags(j, IRQF_VALID); > } > > - irq_set_chained_handler(IRQ_GPIO(i), gpio_irq_handler); > - irq_set_handler_data(IRQ_GPIO(i), (void *)i); > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(IRQ_GPIO(i), gpio_irq_handler, > + (void *)i); > } > > BUG_ON(gpiochip_add(&gemini_gpio_chip)); > -- > 2.1.0 > > Acked-by: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html