On 2015/6/1 20:45, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we >> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Are there dependencies on this patch or can I just apply it > directly to the GPIO tree? Hi Linus, Thanks for review. There's a very long dependency list of this patch set, so it would be safer to merge this patch set altogether through the irq tree if that works:) Thanks! Gerry > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [RFC v1 05/25] gpio: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [RFC v1 05/25] gpio: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc
- From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:48:53 +0800
- In-reply-to: <CACRpkdZfWK5H+gRD6inX31Ouq1XCvq7CneNDJV8x0iihXHzWjw@mail.gmail.com>
- Organization: Intel
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use "const struct ..." rather than "struct ... const"
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH trivial] pinctrl: Spelling s/reseved/reserved/
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC v1 05/25] gpio: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc
- Next by thread: [RFC v1 06/25] pinctrl: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc
- Index(es):
 |