Thomas Petazzoni писал 29.05.2015 12:10:
Dear Andrew Andrianov,
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:29:19 +0300, Andrew Andrianov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Andrianov <andrew@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c
index c4f51d0..78c332d 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static struct mvebu_mpp_mode mv88f6710_mpp_modes[]
= {
MPP_FUNCTION(0x5, "audio", "mclk"),
MPP_FUNCTION(0x6, "uart0", "cts")),
MPP_MODE(63,
- MPP_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpo", NULL),
+ MPP_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio", NULL),
MPP_FUNCTION(0x1, "spi0", "sck"),
MPP_FUNCTION(0x2, "tclk", NULL)),
MPP_MODE(64,
I know the patch has already been applied, but this is weird: I just
checked the datasheet again, and it really says this pin is a "gpo".
I'll try to get some more information.
Best regards,
Thomas
Yep, exactly. I've seen that in the public docs. It must be a typo,
unless there's something we don't know.
On DNS-327L this pin is wired as a button. Without th patch only
gpio-buttons driver fails probing, but you can still configure the pin
as input via sysfs gpio interface and even read sensible values from it.
If you have a board where this pin is broken out - it's easy to test.
--
Regards,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
