On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> What? If I wanted a stable interface I would use sysfs and document >> the ABI in Documentation/ABI/*. >> >> debugfs is not ABI. > > As I mentioned in my response to Grygorii, not everyone -- and most > notably apparently not even Linus Torvalds -- agrees on this: Yeah I was sloppy I guess. What I mean, precisely is that sysfs is ABI, whether documented or not. Even debugfs is actually blurry, as per Documentation/filesystems/debugfs.txt: "The debugfs filesystem is also intended to not serve as a stable ABI to user space; in theory, there are no stability constraints placed on files exported there. The real world is not always so simple, though [1]; even debugfs interfaces are best designed with the idea that they will need to be maintained forever." But I haven't been bitten by it yet so that's why I allow some poetic license. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html