Re: [PATCH] gpio: rcar: Check for irq_set_irq_wake() failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> This should be moved to the commit message I think.
>
> So that's why I put it below the "---".

So it was below the --- and that is why I ask you to move this
useful information above the --- and into the commit message.

>>> -       irq_set_irq_wake(p->irq_parent, on);
>>> +       int error;
>>> +
>>> +       if (p->irq_parent) {
>>> +               error = irq_set_irq_wake(p->irq_parent, on);
>>> +               if (error) {
>>> +                       dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev,
>>> +                               "irq %u doesn't support irq_set_wake\n",
>>> +                               p->irq_parent);
>>> +                       p->irq_parent = 0;
>>> +               }
>>> +       }
>>
>> Does the SH maintainers really like this... Warning
>> appear once and is squelched.
>>
>> Isn't it better to make sure it doesn't happen or something.
>>
>> It looks hacky. Any other suggestions?
>
> The first call to irq_set_irq_wake() (on = true) doesn't print a warning.
> It returns an error code, to indicate that the operation is not supported.
>
> Calling irq_set_irq_wake() again (on = false, during resume) would print
> a warning, as it wouldn't match internal state ("Unbalanced IRQ 26 wake
> disable"). That one is gone now.

Yeah :/

There are a few different patches floating for irq_set_wake() things
and some seem to be causing regressions, I just want some
broader discussion on how we solve this across all platforms.

Maybe the GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP should handle the set_wake()
similarly for all chips?

>> Also, please convert this driver to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
>> like everyone else.
>
> What old branch are you looking at, that it doesn't have commit
> c7f3c5d3ac2d6831 ("gpio: rcar: Switch to use gpiolib irqchip helpers")
> yet ;-)?

Argh sorry. (And that was an awesome patch.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux