Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/gpio/gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a
>> > lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide
>> > an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload
>> >
>> > v2: Ccing maintainers
>> >
>> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the
> same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just
> those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems
> once it's reviewed. Would that be ok?

That's an immutable branch I guess, and yeah I think it's OK.
I usually only pull these in if/when there are conflicts in -next.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html