[RFI] pinmux: pin group ownership

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I have been reviewing the pinmux driver code and I stumbled upon the
following change.

e5b3b2d9ed202697a937c282f9c4d93b1e3e0848 (pinctrl: allows not to define
the get_group_pins operation)

Looking at this change, if pinmux_enable_setting() is called but
.get_group_pins() is not defined, then num_pins will be 0. If this is
the case then pin_request() is not called to allocate the pins in the
group (because no pins are defined for the group). So that makes sense.

However, I am trying to understand then, if the pinmux driver will
protect against another device attempting to use the same group for a
different function when already in-use?

For example, if you have the two functions i2c0 and uart0 mapped to pin
group A, but no pins are defined for group A, will pinmux prevent
someone attempting to configure both functions on the same group at the
same time?

I did not see anywhere that sets a usecount for a group (ie. allocates
the group) but only for a pin.

Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux