On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:33:51PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> + switch (arizona->type) {
> + case WM8998:
> + case WM1814:
> + /* Some bits are shifted on WM8998,
> + * rearrange to match the standard bit layout
> + */
> + val[0] = ((val[0] & 0x60e0) >> 1) |
> + ((val[0] & 0x1e00) >> 2) |
> + (val[0] & 0x000f);
> + break;
Are you sure this approach is going to scale (and avoid confusion)?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
