Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] pinctrl: Support for IMG Pistachio

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Bresticker
<abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:16:53PM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>
>>> This series adds support for the system pin and GPIO controller on the IMG
>>> Pistachio SoC.  Pistachio's system pin controller manages 99 pins, 90 of
>>> which are MFIOs which can be muxed between multiple functions or used
>>> as GPIOs.  The GPIO control for the 90 MFIOs is broken up into banks
>>> of 16.  Pistachio also has a second pin controller, the RPU pin controller,
>>> which will be supported by a future patchset through an extension to this
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> Test on an IMG Pistachio BuB.  Based on mips-for-linux-next which inluces my
>>> series adding Pistachio platform support [1].  A branch with this series is
>>> available at [2].
>>
>> Does this mean you want me to funnel this through the MIPS tree?  If so,
>> could I have an Ack from the maintainers?
>
> Linus mentioned in v1 that if the only dependency was a Kconfig symbol
> that he could take it through his tree.  I'm fine either way, though
> it would be slightly more convenient for it to go through the MIPS
> tree.  Linus?

I took 1/3 into pinctrl since it touched my core documentation and
actually even had to be slightly rebased.

I will look at 2/3 and 3/3 and provide ACK if I think they are
all right.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html