On 03/16/2015 03:42 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
Optional fields are set to -1 by various preprocessor macros. Make
sure the fields can actually store them.
This seems fine to me. I suppose there is a small risk that the old code
let some invalid configurations pass whereas this new code will reject
them and hence not program any later pinmux configurations in the "list"
in DT. However, I suspect the risk is quite small and won't be an issue.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
I also tested this on Beaver, Dalmore, and Jetson TK1 using Paul
Walmsley's automated test system, and saw no issues, so:
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
