On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Make the example code consistent wrt local function and struct definitions. > > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: staticise example code funcs/structs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: staticise example code funcs/structs
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:55:37 +0100
- In-reply-to: <c3ed2457215426bbb856f5ebff39bb97259403fb.1425808985.git.baruch@tkos.co.il>
- References:
- [PATCH] pinctrl: staticise example code funcs/structs
- From: Baruch Siach
- [PATCH] pinctrl: staticise example code funcs/structs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: remove doc mention of the enable/disable API
- Next by Date: Possible regression in next-20150310 due to pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: staticise example code funcs/structs
- Next by thread: gpio_request() vs __gpio_get()
- Index(es):
 |