Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] pinctrl: cygnus: add gpio/pinconf driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ray Jui <rjui@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> (I knew the other three MODULE_* macros are handled in slightly more
>> complicated way, but the effect is basically that they are preprocessed
>> away.)
>>
>> Paul Bolle
>
> Even these module macros will be pre-processed away when the driver is
> statically linked (and yes, I'm not planning to ever make these driver
> built as module), I'm not too sure about the convention here. I thought
> that they are still good to be in the driver for information purpose.
> I'm seeing other pinctrl drivers doing this as well.
>
> Maybe Linus can help to clarify this?

As pointed out in another mail on similar subject, I think these macros
are a kind of obsolete documentation and if they should be dropped we
need to go over an entire subsystem at a time and remove all boolean users
in a big patch.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux