On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add a driver for the pin controller present on the IMG Pistachio SoC. > This driver provides pinmux and pinconfig operations as well as GPIO > and IRQ chips for the GPIO banks. > > Signed-off-by: Damien Horsley <Damien.Horsley@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Govindraj Raja <govindraj.raja@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (...) > +static inline u32 pctl_readl(struct pistachio_pinctrl *pctl, u32 reg) > +{ > + return readl(pctl->base + reg); > +} > + > +static inline void pctl_writel(struct pistachio_pinctrl *pctl, u32 val, u32 reg) > +{ > + writel(val, pctl->base + reg); > +} > + > +static inline u32 gpio_readl(struct pistachio_gpio_bank *bank, u32 reg) > +{ > + return readl(bank->base + reg); > +} > + > +static inline void gpio_writel(struct pistachio_gpio_bank *bank, u32 val, > + u32 reg) > +{ > + writel(val, bank->base + reg); > +} I don't see the point of these special readl/writel accessors. Just use readl/writel directly. Or consider readl/writel_relaxed() if MIPS has this. > +static inline void gpio_mask_writel(struct pistachio_gpio_bank *bank, > + u32 reg, unsigned int bit, u32 val) > +{ > + gpio_writel(bank, (0x10000 | val) << bit, reg); > +} Magic mask? Some comment on what is happening here when OR:in on 0x10000? (...) > +static int pistachio_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > +{ > + struct pistachio_gpio_bank *bank = gc_to_bank(chip); > + > + if (gpio_readl(bank, GPIO_OUTPUT_EN) & BIT(offset)) > + return GPIOF_DIR_OUT; > + return GPIOF_DIR_IN; > +} These flags are not for the driver API. Do this: return !gpio_readl(bank, GPIO_OUTPUT_EN) & BIT(offset)); > +static void pistachio_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, > + int value) > +{ > + struct pistachio_gpio_bank *bank = gc_to_bank(chip); > + > + gpio_mask_writel(bank, GPIO_OUTPUT, offset, !!value); > +} Hm we should clamp value in the core and make the parameter "value" a bool.... sigh for another day when things are calm. (...) > +static void pistachio_gpio_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_get_handler_data(irq); > + struct pistachio_gpio_bank *bank = gc_to_bank(gc); > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(irq); > + unsigned long pending; > + unsigned int pin, virq; Don't call it virq, just call it irq. All Linux irq numbers are virtual so just go with irq. > + > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > + pending = gpio_readl(bank, GPIO_INTERRUPT_STATUS) & > + gpio_readl(bank, GPIO_INTERRUPT_EN); > + for_each_set_bit(pin, &pending, 16) { > + virq = irq_linear_revmap(gc->irqdomain, pin); > + generic_handle_irq(virq); > + } > + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); > +} (...) > +static int pistachio_gpio_register(struct pistachio_pinctrl *pctl) > +{ > + struct device_node *child, *node = pctl->dev->of_node; > + struct pistachio_gpio_bank *bank; > + unsigned int i = 0; > + int irq, ret = 0; > + > + for_each_child_of_node(node, child) { > + if (!of_find_property(child, "gpio-controller", NULL)) > + continue; So why not instead specify "simple-bus" as compatible on the parent node and have each subnode be its own device (simple-bus will spawn platform devices for all subnodes). Overall this composite-device pattern is discouraged if we can instead have unique devices for each bank. Apart from these things the driver looks very nice! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html