Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Store register/field widths in u8 instead of unsigned long

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Laurent,

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2015 10:19:33 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
>> >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
>> >> @@ -69,9 +69,10 @@ struct pinmux_func {
>> >>  };
>> >>
>> >>  struct pinmux_cfg_reg {
>> >> -     unsigned long reg, reg_width, field_width;
>> >> +     unsigned long reg;
>> >
>> > How about making reg a u32 ? It won't make a difference in practice on
>> > 32-bit systems, but it would be more explicit.
>
> You might have missed this comment.

I intended to, with "reg is used here to store a physical register address",
but probably didn't make it sufficiently clear. Before the advent of PAE and
phys_addr_t, unsigned long was used to store physical addresses.

We could indeed use u32, as the PFC regs are (currently) inside the 32-bit
part of the address space.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html