Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: do not implicitly set pin regs to -1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-03-02 13:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Shawn
> 
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 07:45:17PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:30:56PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> > Commit 3dac1918a491 ("pinctrl: imx: detect uninitialized pins") needs
>> > the values in struct imx_pin_reg to be -1. This has been done in a
>> > rather unorthodox way by setting the memory to 0xff using memset...
>> > Use a proper for loop to initialize the whole array with -1.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> too late. This patch is part of 4.0-rc1 (4ff0f034e95d).

This is not the same patch. The patch you are mentioning is actually
fixing a bug introduce in the change where we set -1 for uninitialized
pins. This patch is solving the weird assignment of the initial value...

--
Stefan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux