On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:35 PM, 陈华才 <chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have tested, could I add myself? No. :) But it's good to know that you have tested, too many patches get submitted without care. What I would like to get is an ack from a MIPS maintainer so we can move this code away from that architecture -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Re: [PATCH V7 3/8] MIPS: Cleanup Loongson-2F's gpio driver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V7 3/8] MIPS: Cleanup Loongson-2F's gpio driver
- From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:48:14 +0900
- In-reply-to: <tencent_5337E0085A0993E56C99045F@qq.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: move lock/unlock_as_irq calls into request/release resources methods
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V7 3/8] MIPS: Cleanup Loongson-2F's gpio driver
- Next by thread: gpio: ARCH_MB86S7X?
- Index(es):
 |