Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] ARM: ARMv7M: Enlarge vector table to 256 entries

[Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 2015-02-23 11:33 GMT+01:00 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > 2015-02-20 20:47 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> Who do you target to apply this series?
> >
> > I guess it should go through Russell's Patch Tracking System?
> 
> Sorry, I answered your question too quickly.
> I meant this patch should go through Russell's Patch Tracking System.
> 
> For the other patches, I think it should be picked by their respective
> maintainers.
> Or I can create an immutable tag (on github or kernel.org?) that will
> be merged by the different sub-systems?
> What would you advise?
Depends on the interdependencies of your patches. If each maintainer can
just pick up the patches affecting his area on top of (say) 4.0-rc1 that
would be good.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html