Hello, for an i.MX25 based machine I used the same pin for two different devices (which obviously is an error). The pinctrl driver detected this just fine, but the error message it issued is bogus. It said: imx25-pinctrl 43fac000.iomuxc: pin MX25_PAD_CSI_D9 already requested by 43fac000.iomuxc; cannot claim for gpio-leds imx25-pinctrl 43fac000.iomuxc: could not request pin 80 (MX25_PAD_CSI_D9) from group gpioleds on device 43fac000.iomuxc but actually it was pin MX25_PAD_CSI_MCLK that I used twice. The problem is - drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx25.c has: enum ... { ... MX25_PAD_CSI_D9 = 80, MX25_PAD_CSI_MCLK = 81, ... }; - arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25-pinfunc.h has: #define MX25_PAD_CSI_MCLK__GPIO_1_8 0x140 0x338 0x000 0x15 0x000 - and to determine the pin of a given pinconfig tuple the first value is divided by 4. 0x140 / 4 == 80. All entries in the enum above are affected. Is the right fix to decrement all the values by one (and drop MX25_PAD_RESERVE1)? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html