[PATCH] Documentation: gpio: fix bindings document

[Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
index b9bd1d6..f7a158d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.
 ----------------------------------
 
 A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; active-
-high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be followed:
+high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices should be
+followed:
 
 The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at the
 GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically asserted
@@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows:
 	numeric-gpio-range ::=
 			<pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> <count>
 	named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>'
-	gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node.
+	pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node
 	gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller
 	pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller
 	count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html