On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Olliver Schinagl <oliver+list@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > The gpio binding document says that new code should always use named > gpios. Patch 40b73183 added support to parse a list of gpios from child > nodes, but does not make it possible to use named gpios. This patch adds > the con_id property and implements it is done in gpiolib.c, where the > old-style of using unnamed gpios still works. > > Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx> Alexandre, can you please take a close look at this patch. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: add parameter to allow the use named gpios
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: add parameter to allow the use named gpios
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:36:53 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1420621722-7428-3-git-send-email-oliver+list@schinagl.nl>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 0/4] Let leds use named gpios
- From: Olliver Schinagl
- [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: add parameter to allow the use named gpios
- From: Olliver Schinagl
- [PATCH v1 0/4] Let leds use named gpios
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] gpio:gpiolib: use static const char const * for a suffixes array
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] leds: Let the binding document example for leds-gpio follow the gpio bindings
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: add parameter to allow the use named gpios
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: add parameter to allow the use named gpios
- Index(es):
 |