Hi Arnd, On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 17 November 2014 15:30:32 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Use dynamic allocation of GPIOs instead of looking at the gpio%u alias >> in DT. >> --- >> - Is this correct? Not having to care about the alias would simplify the >> to-be-written DT binding documentation. >> - Completely untested. >> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> > > This will obviously break any user that expects a particular gpio > number, in particular board files, but I guess also user space > that tries to access the gpios through sysfs. > > If you don't have any of those, I guess it's correct. Emev2/kzm9d was the first DT-only shmobile SoC/board, so the kernel part should be OK. No idea about userspace. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html