On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This function actually operates on a gpio_chip, so its prefix should > reflect that fact for consistency with other functions defined in > gpio/driver.h. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Just a consistency change ; hopefully we can slip this under the GPIO > tree without getting acked-bys from each subsystem. OK patch applied, hope I don't get too much breakage from new drivers using the call. Maybe I'll have to apply the patch to both the GPIO and pin control subsystem :-P Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html