On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > irq_set_irq_wake() treats its second argument as a boolean. It is much > easier to read code when constant booleans are either 0 or 1! > > This particular line of code distracted me somewhat when I was doing a bit of > work in a code browser since it (spuriously) got me worried that I had > misunderstood how irq_set_irq_wake() worked. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c > index 73b7396..997e61e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c > @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int gpio_msm_v1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > irq_set_chained_handler(irq1, msm_gpio_irq_handler); > irq_set_chained_handler(irq2, msm_gpio_irq_handler); > irq_set_irq_wake(irq1, 1); > - irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 2); > + irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 1); > return 0; That could be confusing indeed. Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html