On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2014-09-29 13:18 GMT+04:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> +static u32 ar2315_gpio_intmask; >>> +static u32 ar2315_gpio_intval; >>> +static unsigned ar2315_gpio_irq_base; >>> +static void __iomem *ar2315_mem; >> >> Get rid of these local variables and put them into an allocated >> state container, see >> Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt >> > AR2315 SoC contains only one GPIO unit, so there are no reasons to > increase driver complexity. But if you insist, I will add state > container. I insist. It makes the driver easier to maintain if it looks like most other drivers instead of using static locals. >> Convoluted, I would use an if() else construct rather than the ? operator. >> > Convoluted, but 3 lines shorter :) And checkpatch has no objections. True but it's me who is going to be maintaining this, not checkpatch. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html