RE: [PATCHv2 0/3] Enable Quark X1000 support in gpio-sch

["Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun" <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@xxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Courbot [mailto:gnurou@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 09 October, 2014 2:29 PM
> To: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
> Cc: Linus Walleij; Westerberg, Mika; GPIO Subsystem Mailing List; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Enable Quark X1000 support in gpio-sch
> 
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Chang Rebecca Swee Fun
> <rebecca.swee.fun.chang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a revised version for gpio-sch.
> >
> > Change log for V2:
> > Patch 1:
> > - Move sch_gpio_get() and sch_gpio_set() to avoid forward declaration.
> > - Changed sch_gpio_enable()/sch_gpio_disable() to sch_gpio_register_set()/
> >   sch_gpio_register_clear().
> >
> > Patch 3:
> > - Changed all sch_gpio_enable()/sch_gpio_disable() to
> sch_gpio_register_set()/
> >   sch_gpio_register_clear().
> >
> > Version 1:
> > This patch series is about enabling legacy GPIO support for Quark X1000.
> > The patches were developed on top of Mika Westerberg's commit on
> > consolidating core and resume banks. Please refer to the link below
> > for more information about his commit.
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/17/13
> 
> Sorry for the late review. I tried to apply the patch you mentioned above before
> your series, and even Mika's patch won't apply on Linus'
> devel branch or today's -next. This make it difficult to make a good review.
> Could you rebase and resend this series once all its dependencies have been
> merge by Linus W. ?

Hi, I've noticed that Mika had sent a V2series on his work. Referring to his submission in: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/16/213, this patch was able to patch on today's kernel tree. The patches on my series are able to patch in too. Do I need to resend since there is no changes on my side?

Rebecca
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��
b���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f