On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav >> <pramod.gurav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > Get rid of using return value from gpiochip_remove() as it returns >> > void. >> > >> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Already fixed in the GPIO tree. > > What does that mean? That it doesn't need fixing here? No. I think you already ACKed the patch fixing it in the GPIO tree... There has been some misunderstanding and duplicate patches fixing already fixed problems are flying around. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html