On Wednesday 01 October 2014 01:13 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav > <pramod.gurav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Some driver in gpio still check for return value from gpiochip_remove >> Get rid of the check for return value. >> >> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This is already fixed in the GPIO tree, and in linux-next. > > I have got more patches like this from other people, and cannot > quite understand what kind of tree you are actually looking at? > Sorry for this Linus. I have applied these patches on linux-next's 3.17-rc6. Just checked the other patch fixing these have come after rc6. Should have done on master or gpio tree master. Will be more careful next time. > Yours, > Linus Walleij > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html