On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote: > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:11 -0500, atull wrote: > > [] > > > > static int dwapb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > { > > > + int i; > > > struct resource *res; > > > struct dwapb_gpio *gpio; > > > - struct device_node *np; > > > int err; > > > - unsigned int offs = 0; > > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > > + struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev); > > > + bool is_pdata_alloc = !pdata; > > > > Please combine the int's in one line (int err, i;) and put them as > > the last one on this list. It looks the same to the compiler of > > course, but more uniform for human eyes :) > > Do you think it's a good idea? In this case I, for example, would like > to see int err as a separate line at the end of definition block. It > would be better to distinguish counters and return code storage. > Moreover, often counters would be unsigned int. If they are both 'int' they should be combined. If 'i' is changed to be an unsigned int they would be separate. > > -- > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Intel Finland Oy > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Finland Oy > Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki > Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 > Domiciled in Helsinki > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > Andy, This confidentiality footer is problematic on this mailing list. Please see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/790 for example. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html