Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: zynq: Take bank offset into account when reporting a IRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/21/2014 02:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> When looking up the IRQ the bank offset needs to be taken into account.
>>> Otherwise interrupts for banks other than bank 0 get incorrectly reported
>>> as
>>> interrupts for bank 0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>>          * Use lookup table instead of switch-case.
>>
>>
>> I tried to apply this, but it doesn't apply on top of the other patch
>> "gpio: zynq: Fix IRQ handlers" that I have queued for fixes.
>
>
> Works fine for me. Did you try to apply both patch 1 and 2 of this series or
> just patch 2?

Yes, and on my fixes branch, as well as on Torvald's master (which now
has patch 1/2) this happens:

]$ git am --signoff zynq2.patch
Applying: gpio: zynq: Take bank offset into account when reporting a IRQ
error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c:461
error: drivers/gpio/gpio-zynq.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 gpio: zynq: Take bank offset into account when
reporting a IRQ

Can you please test applying this patch only on upstream this and figure
out what is wrong?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux