On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Linus Walleij > <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi ARM SoC guys, >> >> please pull in this patch set removing <mach/gpio.h> for good. >> I guess it could collide with some S5P deletion. >> If you decide to pull the S5P purge first, tell me so I can rebase. >> >> Yours, >> Linus Walleij >> >> >> The following changes since commit 4c834452aad01531db949414f94f817a86348d59: >> >> Linux 3.16-rc3 (2014-06-29 14:11:36 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git >> tags/gpio-h-purge >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 53430333c345c3531f9443d43c6fba1da693abe4: >> >> ARM: delete old reference to ARM_GPIOLIB_COMPLEX (2014-06-30 21:37:39 +0200) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> This is a purge of all things <mach/gpio.h>, now I never >> want to see it again. >> >> - Remove the need for <mach/gpio.h> from S5P >> - Kill CONFIG_NEED_MACH_GPIO_H >> - Kill remnants of ARM_GPIOLIB_COMPLEX >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Linus Walleij (4): >> ARM: s5p: cut the custom ARCH_NR_GPIOS definition >> ARM: mach-s5p: get rid of all <mach/gpio.h> headers >> ARM: kill CONFIG_NEED_MACH_GPIO_H >> ARM: delete old reference to ARM_GPIOLIB_COMPLEX > > So ARM SoC folks, what do we do about this? > > Shall I rebase it or can you pull this in as-is? I'll pull it in as-is. It fell off my list since the thread got marked read by mistake. I'll likely get to it tonight or so. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html