On 10/07/14 10:21, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please note that I submitted a patch on 02/07/14 to create this
function which was acked by Linus Walleij on 05/07/14.
Great minds think alike, and all that.
My mind certainly isn't any great :-(
I doubt that :-)
My left hand seems to be unaware of what the right hand is doing.
Did I ACK that for merging through some other tree then?
You did: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/4/715
And I guess if Himangi want to submit these ASoC patches, they
will have to go through the same tree as those patches in that case?
I don't know enough to comment.
And would you consider implementing a gpiod version...?
I will certainly consider it. I'm in the middle of something else right
now but I should be available in a day or two and I'll have a look.
However, I think that the version I submitted better replicates the
original (non devm) functionality, see below.
I didn't, however, add it to the documentation. +1 on that.
Can you include that oneliner in your patch then to reduce
problems?
Certainly, with acknowledgement to Himangi Saraogi. Should I resubmit
the patch series with amendment or should I put it in as a separate
patch? Sorry for the noobie question but I *am* new to the kernel
lists.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
mailto:rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel:+44 161 236 5575
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
