On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 10:28 PM, abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch updates users of gpiochip_remove return value. > > Signed-off-by: abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@xxxxxxxxx> This doesn't apply on my devel branch from the GPIO tree. Did you really use that branch? This looks more like it was based on the linux-next tree or something. BTW maybe it's better to split this patch in three: - One that removes all users in drivers/gpio so I can apply that to the GPIO tree, patch based on the GPIO "devel" branch. - One that removes all users in drivers/pinctrl based on the pinctrl "devel" branch so I can apply that to the pinctrl tree. - One that removes the rest of the users, that I can maybe just apply to the GPIO tree. This could use some ACKs from the different maintainers, but if I don't get that I can just apply it after some timeout. Then we will apply the second patch actually changing the gpiolib in the next merge window or late in the merge cycle. What do you say? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html