On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> sysfs support is currently entangled within the core GPIO support, while >> it should relly just be a (privileged) user of the integer GPIO API. >> This patch is a first step towards making the gpiolib code more readable >> by splitting it into logical parts. >> >> Move all sysfs support to their own source file, and share static >> members of gpiolib that need to be in the private gpiolib.h file. In >> the future we will want to put some of them back into gpiolib.c, but this >> first patch let us at least identify them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Patch applied. We really need to make refactorings like this > so thanks a lot. Excellent, glad you approve of this. I actually have some more coming after that, since the current lack of organization stands in the way of a proper multi-consumer GPIO implementation. Thanks! Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html