On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:14:23PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [140602 16:06]: > > * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> [140425 00:53]: > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding > > > <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in > > > > addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new > > > > descriptor-based API. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > It appears this can save quite a lot of code in drivers, work that > > > I trust Thierry to persue based on this to some extent so patch is > > > tentatively applied unless something comes up. > > > > Looks like this patch causes a regression where GPIOs on I2C will > > no longer return -EPROBE_DEFER but seem to return -ENOENT instead. > > > > This breaks drivers using things like devm_gpiod_get_index() > > on a GPIO that's on a I2C bus not probed yet. > > > > Reverting commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for > > property names) fixes things. > > Looks like something like below fixes the issue. > > Regards, > > Tony > > 8< ----------------------- > From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:13:46 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of: Fix handling for deferred probe for -gpio suffix > > Commit dd34c37aa3e (gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names) > added parsing for both -gpio and -gpios suffix but also changed > the handling for deferred probe unintentionally. Because of the > looping the second name will now return -ENOENT instead of > -EPROBE_DEFER. Fix the issue by breaking out of the loop if > -EPROBE_DEFER is encountered. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_find_gpio(struct device *dev, const char *con_id, > > desc = of_get_named_gpiod_flags(dev->of_node, prop_name, idx, > &of_flags); > - if (!IS_ERR(desc)) > + if (!IS_ERR(desc) || (PTR_ERR(desc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)) > break; > } This looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
pgpdJWdSKaaIy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
