On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:03 PM, abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This avoids handling gpiochip remove error in device > remove handler. > > Signed-off-by: abdoulaye berthe <berthe.ab@xxxxxxxxx> In general this is the right thing to do. > for (id = 0; id < chip->ngpio; id++) { > - if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &chip->desc[id].flags)) { > - status = -EBUSY; > - break; > - } > - } > - if (status == 0) { > - for (id = 0; id < chip->ngpio; id++) > - chip->desc[id].chip = NULL; > - > - list_del(&chip->list); > + if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &chip->desc[id].flags)) > + panic("gpiolib.c: gpiochip is still requested\n"); panic("gpio: removing gpiochip with gpios still requested\"); is more helpful. But I want a patch that also removes *ALL* users of the return value from this function in the *same* patch to avoid bisectability issues. $ git grep gpiochip_remove Then fix all of them or use coccinelle. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html