Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: make of_get_named_gpiod_flags() private

[Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> of_get_named_gpiod_flags() is visible and directly usable by GPIO
>> consumers, but it really should not as the gpiod interface relies
>> on the simpler gpiod_get() to provide properly-configured GPIOs.
>>
>> of_get_named_gpiod_flags() is just used internally by gpiolib to
>> implement gpiod_get(), and by the old of_get_named_gpio_flags()
>> function, therefore it makes sense to make it gpiolib-private.
>>
>> As a side-effect, the unused (and unneeded) of_get_gpiod_flags()
>> inline function is also removed, and of_get_named_gpio_flags() is moved
>> from a static inline function to a regular one in gpiolib-of.c
>>
>> This results in all references to gpiod_* functions in of_gpio.h being
>> gone, which is the way it should be since this file is part of the old
>> integer GPIO interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Fixed compilation error when CONFIG_OF_GPIO is not defined
>> - Fixed warning due to of_gpio_flags enum not being declared
>>   in private gpiolib.h header
>
> Applied this v2 version and pushed for testing, let's hope it flies
> properly this time :-D

Looks like the world did not break this time. However I noticed that
the commit in your tree (and -next) included the changes since v1 in
its log. Is it intended?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html