On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Robert ABEL > <rabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> But you won't accept my patch, because you don't want to. Not because I'm >> correct, right? Good, thought so. > > This example has nothing to do with the validity of having this or > that function public. > > Besides I have no authority to accept your patch - that's Linus' job. > If he likes your patch nothing that I say will prevent him from > merging it. I will not merge a patch which the GPIO co-maintainer has doubts about, as happens to be the case. Right now I'm more thinking about how we get your patch removing the function into shape so we can apply it and resolve the whole issue, as I trust you to be doing the right thing around the gpiod_* functions for sure. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html