On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:29:11AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What I did so far is having a single domain, with the same handler > > registered for all the interrupts, and the various interrupts from the > > various banks just being at a different offsets in the domain. > > > > Basically, something like that: > > http://code.bulix.org/ym3zuv-86191 > > > > Do you know if it would be possible to use the generic gpiolib > > behaviour in such a case? > > Basically the helpers are for the simple case where every pin > can fire an independent interrupt. > > Since there is just one single irqdomain for the entire chip, the > helpers require that all mappings go through the same domain. > > If having several domains or other split-up results in more > elegant code, then code another solution locally, because we > just want to cover the generic cases, the special cases will still > be special. > > Unless you see some really elegant way forward of course... > always choose the most elegand refactoring if you can. Ok, I'll see what I can come up with then, and give your patch some testing. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
