On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Barry Song <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2014-04-24 5:16 GMT+08:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> This rewrites the SIRF pinctrl driver to allocate a state container >> for the GPIO chip, just as is done for the pin controller, and >> use the gpiochip_add_pin_range() to add the range from the gpiochip >> side rather than adding the range from the pinctrl side. >> >> All resulting changes are done in order to pass around a state >> container rather than refer to a static global object. >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Linus, thanks! but this breaks prima2 pinctrl subsystem, do you have an idea? > otherwise i will do a debug to find the reason. Unfortunately no :-( This is the downside of dry-coding ... I rely on others to help out. See it as a suggestion to what I think should be refactored and how, I'll keep it on a branch as some "TODO" item for the moment. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html