>> > @@ -81,9 +81,15 @@ static inline void zevio_gpio_port_set(struct zevio_gpio *c, unsigned pin, >> > static int zevio_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned pin) >> > { >> > struct zevio_gpio *controller = to_zevio_gpio(chip); >> > + u32 val, dir; >> > >> > - /* Only reading allowed, so no spinlock needed */ >> > - u32 val = zevio_gpio_port_get(controller, pin, ZEVIO_GPIO_INPUT); >> > + spin_lock(&controller->lock); >> > + dir = zevio_gpio_port_get(controller, pin, ZEVIO_GPIO_DIRECTION); >> > + if (dir | BIT(ZEVIO_GPIO_BIT(pin))) >> > + val = zevio_gpio_port_get(controller, pin, ZEVIO_GPIO_INPUT); >> > + else >> > + val = zevio_gpio_port_get(controller, pin, ZEVIO_GPIO_OUTPUT); >> > + spin_unlock(&controller->lock); > > As a side effect of your making me look at the code: > > Is the if() not an "always true" condition? Should this be > s/|/\&/ instead? You are right, I'm sending a v2 now. Thanks for the review, Axel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html