Re: [PATCH] gpio: unmap gpio irqs properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When using the irqchip helper inside the gpiolib, make sure
> the IRQs are unmapped/disposed before the irqdomain is removed
> as part of removing the gpiochip.

Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index f41cb4f3d715..761013f8b82f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -1399,8 +1399,18 @@ static int gpiochip_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static void gpiochip_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> +       set_irq_flags(irq, 0);
> +#endif

Just curious here, why is a special case needed for ARM? I would not
expect architecture-specific code on gpiolib, but I'm sure you have
your reasons for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux