On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, Linus Walleij wrote: > It is currently debated where the functions to lock a certain > GPIO line as used for IRQs should be called. Delete all > misleading documentation. > > Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio: remove misleading documentation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: remove misleading documentation
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:21:53 +0100 (CET)
- In-reply-to: <1394158555-22114-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: remove misleading documentation
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH] gpio: remove misleading documentation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4] gpio: Driver for SYSCON-based GPIOs
- Next by Date: [PATCH v2] gpio: clamp returned values to the boolean range
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: remove misleading documentation
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio-cs5535: Simplify dependencies
- Index(es):
 |