On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c > index a85e00b..929f31e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c > @@ -377,7 +377,6 @@ static int s5p64x0_gpio_setcfg_rbank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip, > reg -= 4; > break; > case 6: > - shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4; > reg -= 4; > default: > shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4; This makes perfect sense from a semantic point of view. But I'm just worried that it may be a syntactic error after all, such as a break; missing in case 6? What does Samsung folks say about this? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html