On 07/11/2016 11:14 PM, Boqun Feng wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:32:11PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
+/*
+ * Initialize the subnodes
+ *
+ * All the sibling CPUs will be in the same subnode. On top of that, we will
+ * put at most 2 sibling groups into the same subnode. The percpu
+ * topology_sibling_cpumask() and topology_core_cpumask() are used for
+ * grouping CPUs into subnodes. The subnode ID is the CPU number of the
+ * first CPU in the subnode.
+ */
+static int __init subnode_init(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ int nr_subnodes = 0;
+ const int subnode_nr_cpus = 2;
+
+ /*
+ * Some of the bits in the subnode_mask will be cleared as we proceed.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, subnode_mask) {
+ int ccpu, scpu;
+ int cpucnt = 0;
+
+ cpumask_var_t core_mask = topology_core_cpumask(cpu);
+ cpumask_var_t sibling_mask;
+
+ /*
+ * Put subnode_nr_cpus of CPUs and their siblings into each
+ * subnode.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu_from(cpu, ccpu, core_mask) {
+ sibling_mask = topology_sibling_cpumask(ccpu);
+ for_each_cpu_from(ccpu, scpu, sibling_mask) {
+ /*
+ * Clear the bits of the higher CPUs.
+ */
+ if (scpu> cpu)
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(scpu, subnode_mask);
Do we also need to clear the 'core_mask' here? Consider a core consist
of two sibling groups and each sibling group consist of two cpus. At the
beginning of the outer loop(for_each_cpu_from(cpu, ccpu, core_mask)):
'core_mask' is 0b1111
so at the beginning of the inner loop first time:
'ccpu' is 0, therefore 'sibling_mask' is 0b1100, in this loop we set the
'cpu_subnode_id' of cpu 0 and 1 to 0.
at the beginning of the inner loop second time:
'ccpu' is 1 because we don't clear cpu 1 from 'core_mask'. Therefore
sibling_mask is still 0b1100, so in this loop we still do the setting on
'cpu_subnode_id' of cpu 0 and 1.
Am I missing something here?
You are right. The current code work in my test as the 2 sibling CPUs
occupy the a lower and higher numbers like (0, 72) for a 72-core system.
It may not work for other sibling CPU assignment.
The core_mask, however, is a global data variable and we cannot modify
it. I will make the following change instead:
diff --git a/lib/persubnode.c b/lib/persubnode.c
index 9febe7c..d1c8c29 100644
--- a/lib/persubnode.c
+++ b/lib/persubnode.c
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ static int __init subnode_init(void)
* subnode.
*/
for_each_cpu_from(cpu, ccpu, core_mask) {
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(ccpu, subnode_mask))
+ continue; /* Skip allocated CPU */
sibling_mask = topology_sibling_cpumask(ccpu);
for_each_cpu_from(ccpu, scpu, sibling_mask) {
/*
Thanks for catching this bug.
Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
